Quadro M2000M vs Radeon E8860
When choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon E8860, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2000M and Radeon E8860.
Radeon E8860
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M2000M has 48% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 463 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro M2000M and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 65% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |