Radeon E8860 vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon E8860 and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon E8860 stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
Radeon E8860
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon E8860 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 has 5% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon E8860 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon E8860 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 325 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 61% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 130% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 107% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon E8860 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Venus | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 25 January 2014 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 227 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |