Radeon E8860 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When choosing between Radeon E8860 and Radeon Pro WX 3200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon E8860 and Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Radeon E8860
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon E8860 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 75% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon E8860 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 507 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon E8860 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 70% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 57% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
Radeon E8860 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Venus | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 25 January 2014 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |