Radeon E8860 vs Radeon R7 M270
In this comparison between Radeon E8860 and Radeon R7 M270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon E8860 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E8860
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Radeon E8860 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon E8860 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- Radeon E8860 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 250 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Radeon E8860 and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
Radeon E8860 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Venus | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 25 January 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |