Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 4770
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon HD 4770 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4770 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4770
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 80 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4770 has 166% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4770 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4770 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon HD 4770 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4770 is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4770 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4770 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Iris Graphics 5100 and Radeon HD 4770 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4770. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 5100 | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | TeraScale |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | RV740 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 28 April 2009 |
Pipelines | 40 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 750 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 826 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 24.00 |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops | |
Length | 203 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6850M