Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 4770
When comparing Quadro M2000M and Radeon HD 4770, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon HD 4770 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4770
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 80 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4770 has 45% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4770 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4770 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4770 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4770 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 288 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4770 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 1800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon HD 4770. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | RV740 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 April 2009 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 750 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 826 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 24.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Length | 203 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M2000M vs Tesla C2050
- Quadro M2000M vs Quadro 7000
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Tesla C2050
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Quadro 7000
- Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6850M