Quadro M5000M vs Radeon HD 4770
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M5000M and Radeon HD 4770, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M5000M stacks up against Radeon HD 4770, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4770
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 80 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M has 25% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4770.
- Quadro M5000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4770 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4770 has 504 GB more memory, than Quadro M5000M.
- Quadro M5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4770 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M5000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4770 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 212 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
- Quadro M5000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4770 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 1800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M5000M and Radeon HD 4770 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M5000M and Radeon HD 4770 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon HD 4770. |
Full Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | RV740 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 April 2009 |
Pipelines | 1,536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 962 MHz | 750 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 826 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 24.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Length | 203 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon HD 4770 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon HD 4770 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro M5000M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M5000M vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6850M