Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4770 and Radeon Pro 5300M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4770 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 5300M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4770
Radeon Pro 5300M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5300M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5300M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4770 | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 5300M has 6% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4770.
- Radeon HD 4770 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 5300M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 4770 has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 5300M.
- Radeon HD 4770 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 5300M - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon HD 4770 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro 5300M - with Navi / RDNA.
- Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 5300M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 5300M is 8800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon HD 4770 and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon HD 4770 and Radeon Pro 5300M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5300M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon HD 4770. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4770 | Radeon Pro 5300M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Navi / RDNA |
Code name | RV740 | Navi 14 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 April 2009 | 13 November 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | |
Transistor count | 826 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 | 100.0 |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops | |
Length | 203 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Quadro M3000M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs GeForce GTX 1050
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs Quadro M3000M
- Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050