GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon HD 4810
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon HD 4810. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon HD 4810. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4810
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 780M has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 198 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
- GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 1100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 468% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 780M | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | N14E-GTX | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce GTX 880M
- Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce 920M
- GeForce GTX 780M vs GeForce 9800 GTX
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 920M
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 9800 GTX