GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon HD 4810
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 2Q and Radeon HD 4810. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon HD 4810. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon HD 4810
Main Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GRID M60 2Q has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 510 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 2Q is 21 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 1412 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 2Q and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GRID M60 2Q and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM204 | RV770 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 246 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |