GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon HD 4810
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 4810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon HD 4810
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GRID M60 8Q has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 504 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 8Q is 21 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1412 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 296% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 468% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM204 | RV770 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 246 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |