HD Graphics 6000 vs Radeon HD 4810
In this comparison between HD Graphics 6000 and Radeon HD 4810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 6000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4810
HD Graphics 6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 6000 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 6000 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 533% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 6000.
- HD Graphics 6000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 6000 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 6000 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 325 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 6000.
- HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 900% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 6000 and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| HD Graphics 6000 and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 6000 in World of Tanks is 84% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 6000 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |