Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 4810
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 4810. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 4810. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4810
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 225 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | − |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 513% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | RV770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 28 May 2009 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 920M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 9800 GTX
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 920M
- Radeon HD 4810 vs GeForce 9800 GTX