Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon HD 4810
When choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 4810, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 4810.
Radeon HD 4810
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 508 GB more memory, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 666 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | TeraScale |
Code name | iDG1LPDEV | RV770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 31 October 2020 | 28 May 2009 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Check Price |