Quadro P3200 vs Radeon HD 4810
In this comparison between Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 4810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P3200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4810
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 5572 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 83 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 3408 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | − |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 4810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 786% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1337% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | N18E-Q1 | RV770 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 February 2017 | 28 May 2009 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |