Radeon HD 4810 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4810 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon HD 4810

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Radeon HD 4810	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	1x DVI
		Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 160% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon HD 4810 has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 51 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 2 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4810.
Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 468 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Radeon HD 4810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4810.

Full Specs

	Radeon HD 4810	Tesla C2075
Architecture	TeraScale	Fermi 2.0
Code name	RV770	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	28 May 2009	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	625 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	20.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	800.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	246 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
		Check Price

Radeon HD 4810 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares