GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 4830
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon HD 4830, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 285M SLI stacks up against Radeon HD 4830, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4830
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285M SLI is 1 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon HD 4830 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 780 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 193% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 342% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 166% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 466% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale |
| Code name | N10E-GTX | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |