Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon HD 4830
When choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon HD 4830, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon HD 4830.
Radeon HD 4830
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 533% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 275 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Battlefield 5 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 31% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |