Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 4830
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4830, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 655 stacks up against Radeon HD 4830, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4830
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 533% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 275 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 383% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4830 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 342% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 146% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 466% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 62% more, than Radeon HD 4830. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | RV770 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 21 October 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Radeon HD 4830 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon HD 4830 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R5 M435
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs UHD Graphics 615
- Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R5 M435
- Radeon HD 4830 vs UHD Graphics 615