Quadro M3000M vs Radeon HD 4830
In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and Radeon HD 4830 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4830 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4830
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 95 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 26% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 475 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M3000M and Radeon HD 4830 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 216% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M3000M and Radeon HD 4830 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4830. |
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | RV770 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 21 October 2008 |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 575 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |