Quadro M4000M vs Radeon HD 4830
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4830. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4830. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4830
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 5% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4830 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000M.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4830 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4830 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Quadro M4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4830 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3212 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4830 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 216% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4830 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 6−7 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Radeon HD 4830 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM204 | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 21 October 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1,280 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 736.0 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |