Radeon HD 4830 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4830 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4830 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4830
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4830 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 150% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 4830 has 509 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4830 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 1 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla C2050 is 2 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 566% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 666% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4830 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 October 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |