Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 4850
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 4850, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 4850 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon HD 4850
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
110 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
512 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon HD 4850 has 633% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4850 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Radeon HD 4850 has 480 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 - with Terascale 1.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
1−2
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−11
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
150−160
120−130
medium / 768p
120−130
95−100
ultra / 1080p
60−65
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
10−11
high / 768p
90−95
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
medium / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
9−10
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
10−12
medium / 1080p
10−11
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
27−30
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
5−6
1−2
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
14−16
5−6
medium / 1080p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
60−65
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
5−6
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
30−35
12−14
medium / 768p
20−22
9−10
high / 1080p
10−12
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
90−95
65−70
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 37% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon HD 4850
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Terascale 1
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
RV770
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
3 January 2017
25 June 2008
Pipelines
48
800
Core clock speed
300 MHz
625 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
956 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
25.00
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
1,000.0 gflops
Length
246 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
993 MHz
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model
6.4
4.1
OpenGL
4.6
3.3
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price