Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4850
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 4850 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon HD 4850
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
110 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon HD 4850 has 633% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4850 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 - with Terascale 1.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
1−2
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
high / 768p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
6−7
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
9−10
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−11
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
8−9
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
3−4
1−2
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
5−6
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
high / 1080p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
16−18
12−14
medium / 768p
12−14
9−10
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
low / 768p
80−85
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon HD 4850
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Terascale 1
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
RV770
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
2 June 2015
25 June 2008
Pipelines
48
800
Core clock speed
300 MHz
625 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
956 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
25.00
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,000.0 gflops
Length
246 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
993 MHz
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model
5.1
4.1
OpenGL
4.4
3.3
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.80
N/A
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
