FirePro S9000 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 4850 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- FirePro S9000 has 40% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 506 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 275 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3510 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tahiti | R700 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |