GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 342 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 10 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Dota 2 is 65% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Fortnite is 118% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N14P-GT | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |