GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 557% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 511 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 811 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | GT2xx | TeraScale |
Code name | N11E-GS1 | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 7 January 2010 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 96 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 727 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |