GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 49 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon HD 4850 X2 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 970 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 65% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 104% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | G9x | TeraScale |
Code name | N10E-GTX | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 256 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 6990M
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs FireStream 9370
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon HD 6990M
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs GeForce 840A
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295