GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 511 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 259 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 290 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 54% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
| Code name | GF104 | R700 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1990 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |