GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 3 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2018 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK106 | R700 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1990 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |