Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 480 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce 840A
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295