Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 455% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 384 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | TeraScale |
| Code name | Haswell GT3e | R700 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 840A
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295