Quadro K3100M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K3100M and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K3100M and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- Quadro K3100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 81 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- Quadro K3100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 1210 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 136% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K3100M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3100M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | N15E-Q1-A2 | R700 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 7 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 45.18 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,084 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1990 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |