Quadro M3000M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M3000M and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M3000M and Radeon HD 4850 X2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 425 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3010 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 363% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |