Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
When comparing Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon Pro WX 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | 4x DisplayPort |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 233% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 504 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 88 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 3010 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | R700 | Ellesmere |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 November 2008 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics