Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon R7 Carrizo you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 Carrizo will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1983% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Call of Duty: Warzone is 12% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon R7 Carrizo have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Radeon R7 Carrizo have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | R700 | Carrizo |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 November 2008 | 4 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 2410 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |