Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Tesla T4
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Tesla T4. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Tesla T4. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Tesla T4
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 257% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 496 GB more memory, than Tesla T4.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 40 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 99 mm longer, than Tesla T4.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8010 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4850 X2 | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
| Code name | R700 | TU104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 November 2008 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |