GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M and Radeon HD 4870 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 472% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 755M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 280 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 1800 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N14P- | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |