Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4870 X2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 1806% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 M465