Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 1806% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 400 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Fortnite is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | TeraScale |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 M465