Quadro K4000M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
When choosing between Quadro K4000M and Radeon HD 4870 X2, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K4000M and Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 186% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Quadro K4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K4000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
- Quadro K4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K4000M and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 48% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 91% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro K4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N14E-Q3 | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 960 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.08 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 37 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Quadro K4000M vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 M465