Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon HD 4870 X2, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M2000M stacks up against Radeon HD 4870 X2, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 420% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 338 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 133% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 640 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |