Quadro P3200 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
When comparing Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 4870 X2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P3200 and Radeon HD 4870 X2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 286 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6084 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6083 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Quadro P3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P3200 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 8 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Quadro P3200 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 3408 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 590% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 80−85 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 750% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 347% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 533% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 290% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 840% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 145% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 485% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 666% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro P3200 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | N18E-Q1 | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 February 2017 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 708 - 1202 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |