Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Tesla M10
When choosing between Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Tesla M10, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Tesla M10.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Tesla M10
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 286 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 27% more power consumption, than Tesla M10.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 7 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 333 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 1600 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | R700 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2008 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |