Quadro K3000M vs Radeon HD 5970
When comparing Quadro K3000M and Radeon HD 5970, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3000M and Radeon HD 5970 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 5970
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K3000M | Radeon HD 5970 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 294 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 292% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 5970 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 5970 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 5970 is 71 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 5970 is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Battlefield 5 is 43% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K3000M and Radeon HD 5970 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K3000M | Radeon HD 5970 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | N14E-Q1 | Hemlock |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 18 November 2009 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 58.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |