Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 5970
When choosing between Quadro M2000M and Radeon HD 5970, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M2000M and Radeon HD 5970.
Radeon HD 5970
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 294 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 434% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon HD 5970 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 5970 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 313 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 60% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 48% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon HD 5970. |
Full Specs
Quadro M2000M | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Hemlock |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 18 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 58.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |