Quadro M4000M vs Radeon HD 5970
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 5970. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 5970. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 5970
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 294 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 194% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 5970 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M4000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 5970 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 250 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Quadro M4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 1012 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 226% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 161% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 226% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon HD 5970. |
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM204 | Hemlock |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 18 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 58.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |