Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 5970
When comparing Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon HD 5970, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro T2000 mobile and Radeon HD 5970 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 5970
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 294 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 390% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 5970 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro T2000 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 5970 - in Desktops.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 850 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Quadro T2000 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 226% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 161% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 226% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon HD 5970. |
Full Specs
Quadro T2000 mobile | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | N19P-Q3 | Hemlock |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 18 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 58.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon R9 380X
- Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 5870
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs FirePro V7900
- Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon HD 5870
- Radeon HD 5970 vs FirePro V7900