Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon Pro 460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 5970 and Radeon Pro 460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 5970 and Radeon Pro 460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 5970
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 294 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 740% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Radeon HD 5970 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Radeon HD 5970 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Radeon HD 5970 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
- Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 5970.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 46% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
| Code name | Hemlock | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 November 2009 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.00 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |