FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 6550A
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 6550A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6550A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 6550A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6550A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6550A has 6% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 6550A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 6550A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon HD 6550A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6550A.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6550A - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2900 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6550A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6550A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6550A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon HD 6550A. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6550A | |
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Pinewood |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 7 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 627 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 13.20 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |